10. Comments on the Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) study on the
Proposed Waste
to Energy (WTE) Plant at La Chaumière.
First Page << Previous << 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 Next >> Last Page >>
10.7 EU Directive (2000/76/EC)
The EIA report in an attempt to allay the impacts on human health of gaseous
emissions from the proposed WTE Plant, has adopted the emissions standards as
stated in EU Directive (2000/76/EC) and proposed state of the art air pollution
control technologies.
The EIA report fails to recognise that proper control of air emissions requires more
than the presence of state of the art air pollution control technologies. MSW
incineration facilities must be well operated and well maintained to ensure that the
objectives of lower emissions of pollutants are achieved. Combustion practices can
control emission by ensuring that the temperature in the combustion chamber and the
time the MSW remains in the combustion chamber are kept at optimal levels. Major
variations in these or other incineration process operations, for example during start
up, shut down and upset conditions, will lead to significant higher emission rates
than under steady state conditions.
The EU Directive (2000/76/EC) on incineration of wastes covers both the
incineration of hazardous wastes (formerly Directive 94/67/EC) and non-hazardous
wastes (formerly Directives 89/369/EEC and 89/429/EEC).
Essentially EU Directive (2000/76/EC) introduces stricter provisions than those
found in the former Directives, inter alia:
• It sets up new lower limit values for gaseous emissions and introduces
Dioxins as a new parameter for discharges into water;
• It control releases not only to the atmosphere but also sets out emission
standards and conditions for discharges of wastewater to the aquatic
environment so as to minimise the impacts of incineration on marine and
fresh water ecosystems;
• It stipulates that residues from the combustion process must be minimised
in their amount of harmfulness and recycled where appropriate and if not
possible disposed of only under certain conditions;
• It provides for public consultation, access to information and participation
into the permitting procedure;
• It envisages procedures for the application and granting of operating
permits and sets a series of operating conditions.
The EU legislators having recognised that strict lower emission standards for
pollutants released during MSW incineration are necessary to reduce risks to the
environment and human health went to the extent of specifying stringent operational
conditions and technical requirements to ensure that these standards are achievable.
The distinction between hazardous and non-hazardous waste is based principally on
the properties of the waste prior to incineration or co-incineration but not on the
differences in emissions. The same emission limit values should apply to the
incineration or co-incineration of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes waste but
different techniques and conditions of incineration or co-incineration and different
monitoring measures upon reception of waste should be retained.55
• Operational Conditions and Technical Requirements for Incineration of
MSW
With regard to incineration of MSW waste, the operational conditions and
technical requirements are clearly spelt out and these include:
o The definition of municipal waste and fractions that are excluded;
o The delivery and reception of wastes;
o Operating conditions with specifications on the temperature of the
combustion gases and how to maintain the temperature during start up and
shut down;
o EU Directive clearly states that the incinerator shall have and operate an
automatic system to prevent waste feed (Article 6 (3)):
(a) at start up until the temperature of 850oC or 1100oC as the case may be
or the temperature specified according to paragraph 4 has been reached;
(b) whenever the temperature of 850oC or 1100oC as the case may be or the
temperature specified according to paragraph (4) is not maintained;
(c) whenever the continuous measurements required by this Directive show
that any emission limit value is exceeded due to disturbances or failures
of the purification devices.
o Management of residues;
o Control and monitoring and the measurement requirements among others.
The EIA Report seems to suggest that the maximum limits set out in the EU Directives are stringent enough whereas Clause 13 of the said Directive clearly spells out that “Compliance with the emission limit laid down by this Directive should be regarded as a necessary but not sufficient condition for compliance56 with the requirements of Directive 96/61/EC. The Directive further states that “such compliance may involve more stringent emissions limit values for the pollutants envisaged by this Directive, emission limit values for other substances and other media, and other appropriate conditions”.
Conclusion:
Although the EIA report has adopted the EU standards for gaseous emissions as
stated in EU Directive (2000/EC/76), yet it fails to recognise that proper control of
air emissions requires more than the presence of state of the art air pollution control
technologies. Operational conditions and technical requirements are specified in the
EU Directive so as to ascertain that the strict emission standards are achieved for
waste incineration.
_______________________________
55 EU Directive (2000/EC/76) (16) pL332/92
56 Bold and underline for emphasis.
_______________________________
First Page << Previous << 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 Next >> Last Page >>
